Compare or Contrast 2 philosophy thinkers Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 words

Comp argon or Contrast 2 philosophy thinkers - Essay pillow slips, which are actual sense perceptions, and ideas, which are copies of impressions, connect with one an early(a) to form complexities that explain all things. In short, for Hume, the only things that we can possibly live are the impressions that can be perceived by our senses and the ideas that we imagine after seeing the impressions (Hume, An Inquiry Concerning Human Understanding 201). On the other hand, Kant theorizes that there are three ways or categories where knowledge of the relationship between two things, or subject and predicate, can be derived. These are the analytic a priori, the man-made a posteriori, and the controversial synthetic a priori. Kants analytic a priori is knowing by definition, like believing that All single people are people who have not married. Kants synthetic a posteriori is like Most sick people are given medicine, which is merely a article of faith out of habit. Lastly, Kants syntheti c a priori is believing something like Some dead parents are remembered by their children, which is a belief from intuition. These beliefs do not entreat proof as what Hume believed (Durant 269-271).Another difference between Hume and Kant is on their ethical principles. According to Humes A Treatise on Human Nature and based on his epistemology, it is our feelings or sentiments that practically influence human volition and action. It is not reason but our feelings and sentiments produce our actions with the comparable habitual expectation that the future will resolve from the past. For Hume, morality is doing something because of an enduring passion or trait of character in the agent and without regard for any custom or reason (Cohon). On the other hand, based on Kants Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals, morality is performing the categorical imperative Act only according to the maxim whereby you can at the same time will that it should become a universal law, and to act in such a way that he should treat