Final Essay Questions

Social program line surmisal suggests that offensive , its determent and preponderance , is a product of the cognitive process of social cultivation and interactions . thusly , incarnate crime is a consequence of the work conditions and purlieu of employees (Simpson , 2002 . Employees ar motivated from committing crime to stay as lapse out of their orientation into the organization or to protect peerless s line of descent , advancement and social standing in the company . get the hangs of corporate crime loafer then be developed at once , by establishment of retributory measures such(prenominal) as demotion , prisonbreak or dismissal indirectly by offering incentives for life history advancement for those who keep an eye on with regulations internally by emphasizing the communal effect of chastening to comply w ith regulations and through needs joy methods or providing benefits such as retirement or commitment programsEnvironmental criminology suggests a concern amidst the incidence of crime and spatial settings . This means that there are certain environments that become predispose to crime or to a particular crime or that an individual s cognitive deportments are influenced by this environment . These spatial areas are characterized by non only living conditions still also by a lifestyle that creates greater pic to victimization (Bartol Bartol , 2006 . These areas develop because of the pic of victims , lack of mechanisms for monitoring or detection and the possibility of evidential rewards from crimeAmong the sociological theories regarding criminal look , learning theory fanny provided significant insights to the current trends in homicides and assaults in the United States . In contrast to obligate theory , there is indication that penitentiary measures and conditioning is not influencing these crime trends as ind! icated by the establishemtn of no clear relationship between the severity of control mechanisms and the preponderance of homicides and assault (Weisner et al , 2003 .

though this is not to day that control theories can not be productive in the teach of criminal behavior , by using learning theories , the character of these crimes can be examine to determine what causes the characteristics or behaviors associated with aggressiveness (Jensen , 2007 . Furthermore , by perusal the social learning process that leads to these crimes , factors that influence the level of control that individuals can develop can used to determine interference p rogramsReferencesBartol , Curt R Anne M . Bartol (2006 . Current Perspectives in rhetorical Psychology And Criminal jurist . London : Sage PublicationsJensen , Gary F (2007 . Social Learning and fierce Behavior . The Cambridge Handbook of Violent Behavior . David Flannery , Alexander Vazonsyi , and Irwin Waldman (Editors . Cambridge : Cambridge University PressSimpson , cranny S (2002 . Corporate execration . Law , and Social Control Cambridge : Cambridge University PressWeisner , M , Capaldi , D . M Paterson , G ( 2003 . Development of ant-social behavior and crime across the life-span from a social interactionist perspective : The coercion model . In R . L . Akers G . F Jensen (Eds . Social Learning and the report of Crime : New Directions for a New Century . pp . 317-337Title page 2...If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: BestEssayCheap.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: cheap essay